Political instability in Pakistan

 Political Instability in Pakistan: An In-depth Analysis

---

1. Introduction

Political instability has been a recurring feature of Pakistan’s history since its creation in 1947. Despite possessing considerable strategic importance, a large population, and natural resources, Pakistan has failed to achieve stable governance. The country has oscillated between democratic rule, military dictatorships, and hybrid regimes where power is informally shared between elected officials and the military. Political instability in Pakistan has resulted in frequent government changes, weak democratic institutions, corruption, economic volatility, judicial interference, and military dominance in civilian matters.

This comprehensive discussion delves into the historical evolution, underlying causes, institutional weaknesses, external factors, and social consequences of political instability in Pakistan.

---

2. Historical Background of Political Instability

2.1 The Creation of Pakistan and Early Challenges (1947–1958)

Pakistan was created from British India in 1947 amidst chaos and partition violence.

Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the founding father, died in 1948; Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan was assassinated in 1951.

The new country lacked a clear constitutional framework—the first constitution only came in 1956.

Civil-military bureaucracy dominated governance due to weak political leadership and regional tensions.

In 1958, the first military coup occurred, ushering in a cycle of intermittent martial law.

2.2 Military Rule and Civilian Setbacks (1958–1988)

Ayub Khan (1958–1969): Promised stability and modernization but curtailed political freedoms.

Yahya Khan (1969–1971): Oversaw the 1971 secession of East Pakistan, resulting in Bangladesh’s creation.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (1971–1977): Tried to build civilian rule but was overthrown by General Zia-ul-Haq.

Zia-ul-Haq (1977–1988): Imposed Islamization and military rule; his death led to a temporary democratic revival.

2.3 Democratic Experiments and Military Interventions (1988–1999)

The 1990s saw democratic governments under Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, but both were dismissed before completing terms.

Power struggles, corruption, and poor governance led to instability.

Military influence remained strong, with the army acting as the ultimate arbiter.

2.4 General Pervez Musharraf Era (1999–2008)

In 1999, General Musharraf overthrew Nawaz Sharif in a military coup.

Musharraf aligned with the U.S. after 9/11, gaining international legitimacy.

However, his rule also faced resistance, including the Lawyers’ Movement of 2007.

He stepped down in 2008, allowing the return of civilian rule.

2.5 Civilian Rule in the 21st Century (2008–Present)

Civilian governments led by PPP (2008–2013) and PML-N (2013–2018) made modest democratic gains.

Imran Khan's PTI won in 2018 with alleged military support, but later fell out with the establishment.

In 2022, Khan was removed through a no-confidence vote, sparking political chaos and mass protests.

---

3. Major Causes of Political Instability in Pakistan

3.1 Military Interference in Politics

The Pakistani military has ruled directly for over 30 of the country’s 75 years.

Even during civilian rule, the military dominates foreign policy, nuclear policy, India relations, and internal security.

The army supports or undermines political parties depending on alignment with its interests.

“Hybrid democracy” is a term often used to describe the military-civilian power-sharing.

3.2 Weak Democratic Institutions

Parliament is often ineffective, with low attendance and limited debate.

Political parties are personality-based rather than policy-driven.

The judiciary has historically supported military takeovers, weakening rule of law (e.g., Doctrine of Necessity).

3.3 Corruption and Cronyism

Transparency International regularly ranks Pakistan poorly on corruption indices.

Politicians have been accused of money laundering, nepotism, and patronage politics.

This erodes public trust in political institutions and discourages merit-based governance.

3.4 Judicial Politicization

The judiciary often gets entangled in politics.

Landmark rulings have removed elected prime ministers (e.g., Nawaz Sharif in 2017).

Courts are seen as being influenced by the military establishment or political factions.

3.5 Electoral Rigging and Unfair Practices

Accusations of election rigging have tainted the credibility of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

The 2018 elections were considered rigged in favor of Imran Khan's PTI by many observers.

3.6 Ethnic and Sectarian Divides

Pakistan is a diverse country with Punjabis, Sindhis, Baloch, Pashtuns, and Muhajirs.

Ethnic tensions have often translated into political unrest and separatist movements (e.g., in Balochistan).

Sectarian violence (Sunni-Shia, Deobandi-Barelvi) also contributes to instability.

3.7 Media Suppression and Misinformation

Media in Pakistan faces censorship, arrests, and shutdowns.

Journalists critical of the military or government have been harassed, abducted, or killed.

Disinformation campaigns further polarize public opinion and destabilize democratic debate.

---

4. Consequences of Political Instability

4.1 Economic Decline

Political instability causes capital flight, reduced foreign investment, and economic mismanagement.

Inflation, unemployment, and currency devaluation have worsened due to unstable governments.

Ongoing IMF bailouts and debt dependency reflect long-term economic mismanagement.

4.2 Social Polarization and Violence

Political parties often mobilize followers along ethnic, sectarian, or linguistic lines.

Political instability frequently results in street protests, riots, police brutality, and mass arrests.

The May 9, 2023 events, following Imran Khan’s arrest, led to widespread violence and military backlash.

4.3 Erosion of Public Trust

A recurring cycle of ousted governments, rigged elections, and corrupt leadership has eroded citizen confidence.

Voter turnout remains relatively low; youth participation in politics is declining.

Many citizens seek migration abroad due to disillusionment with domestic politics.

4.4 Weak Governance and Poor Public Services

Frequent changes in leadership hinder long-term policymaking.

Ministries and development projects are often stalled or reversed with each new government.

Basic services like education, health, and water management remain underdeveloped.

---

5. Key Political Crises in Recent Years

5.1 The Disqualification of Nawaz Sharif (2017)

Nawaz Sharif, Prime Minister from PML-N, was disqualified by the Supreme Court over the Panama Papers scandal.

Critics claimed the military orchestrated his removal through judicial means.

5.2 The Rise and Fall of Imran Khan (2018–2022)

Imran Khan’s government was accused of authoritarianism, media censorship, and poor economic management.

In April 2022, he was voted out by the opposition, leading to mass protests and political turmoil.

His subsequent legal troubles and arrest further destabilized politics.

5.3 May 9 Events and Civil-Military Fallout

After Khan’s arrest in May 2023, violent protests targeted military properties.

This marked a turning point in civil-military relations.

PTI was cracked down upon; hundreds of its leaders were jailed or defected under pressure.

---

6. Role of Civil Society and Judiciary

6.1 Judiciary as a Political Actor

While the judiciary has occasionally stood up to military rule (e.g., Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry in 2007), it often becomes a tool for political engineering.

The use of court verdicts to disqualify politicians has undermined electoral mandates.

6.2 Role of the Lawyers’ Movement

The 2007 Lawyers’ Movement was a rare example of civil resistance against military interference.

It contributed to the restoration of judicial independence, but gains have been rolled back in recent years.

6.3 Media and Civil Society

NGOs, journalists, and activists play a crucial role but operate under constant threats, surveillance, and censorship.

Social media offers new platforms for resistance but is also monitored and manipulated.

---

7. External Influences and International Reactions

7.1 U.S. and Western Involvement

The U.S. has historically supported military regimes (e.g., Zia and Musharraf) for geopolitical interests.

Democracy promotion remains selective and inconsistent.

7.2 China’s Role

China, Pakistan’s close ally, emphasizes stability over democracy.

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) depends on a secure political environment, pushing China to favor strong central authority.

7.3 IMF and Financial Institutions

Economic bailouts from the IMF often come with conditions like fiscal reform, which are unpopular and destabilizing.

Political turmoil hampers Pakistan’s ability to fulfill these conditions, leading to cycles of debt.

---

8. Paths to Stability and Democratic Consolidation

8.1 Strengthening Civilian Control

Reforms are needed to ensure parliamentary supremacy, especially in military affairs.

The military budget and operations must be made accountable to civilian oversight.

8.2 Electoral Reforms

Fair, transparent elections under an independent ECP are critical.

The use of electronic voting machines, biometric verification, and stronger monitoring can restore trust.

8.3 Judicial Independence

Judges must be protected from political and military pressure.

Appointments should be merit-based, and courts must focus on the constitution rather than partisan battles.

8.4 Free Press and Civil Liberties

A free media must be protected from censorship and harassment.

Journalists and whistleblowers need legal safeguards.

8.5 Political Maturity and Consensus Building

Political parties must move beyond zero-sum rivalries and focus on issue-based politics.

A Charter of Democracy among parties, like the one in 2006, should be revived and respected.

---

Conclusion

Political instability in Pakistan is a deeply rooted, multifaceted problem stemming from military dominance, weak democratic institutions, judicial politicization, corruption, ethnic tensions, and external manipulation. While Pakistan has seen democratic transitions and a growing middle class, these gains remain fragile due to repeated disruptions by non-civilian actors and systemic governance failures.

To move toward stability, Pakistan must restore civilian supremacy, implement electoral and judicial reforms, encourage civil liberties, and create an inclusive political environment that respects diversity and dissent. Only then can Pakistan break free from the cycle of instability and move toward sustainable democracy and development.