ATACMS missiles
How Many ATACMS Has the USA Provided to Ukraine: An Elaborate Discussion
Introduction
The Russo-Ukrainian War, which began in 2014 with the annexation of Crimea and escalated dramatically in 2022 with Russia’s full-scale invasion, has dramatically altered global military dynamics. A key facet of this war has been the provision of advanced weapon systems to Ukraine by Western allies, particularly the United States. Among the most strategically significant weapons transferred to Ukraine is the ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System). This weapon has changed the operational capabilities of Ukrainian forces by allowing them to strike deep into Russian-controlled territory.
This discussion elaborates on:
What the ATACMS is and how it works
The timeline of U.S. aid and delivery
Types of ATACMS delivered
The strategic and operational impact
Political decisions surrounding the transfer
The known number of ATACMS provided
Future prospects
---
1. What Is the ATACMS Missile System?
1.1 Definition and Overview
The ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System) is a U.S.-made surface-to-surface missile capable of hitting targets at long distances with high precision. It is fired from the M270 MLRS (Multiple Launch Rocket System) or the M142 HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System).
1.2 Technical Capabilities
Range: Depending on the variant, between 165 km and 300+ km
Warhead: Can carry unitary warheads or cluster munitions
Accuracy: GPS-guided for precision strikes
Speed: Supersonic (around Mach 3)
1.3 Key Variants
M39 (Block I): Up to 165 km, carries 950 submunitions (cluster warhead)
M39A1 (Block IA): Up to 300 km, carries submunitions
M48 & M57 (Block IA Unitary): 300 km range, single explosive warhead
M57A1: Upgraded with modern electronics and navigation
---
2. Timeline of ATACMS Deliveries to Ukraine
2.1 Early Hesitation
From 2022 to early 2023, the U.S. hesitated to provide ATACMS due to fears of escalation with Russia. There were concerns that long-range missile strikes on Russian territory might provoke a wider war.
2.2 First Batch (October 2023)
In October 2023, the U.S. secretly delivered the first batch of ATACMS to Ukraine. These were M39 (Block I) missiles with a range of 165 km and a cluster warhead. Their delivery was confirmed after Ukraine used them to strike Russian airbases in Luhansk and Berdyansk, destroying helicopters and air defense systems.
Reported number: 20 to 30 missiles
Use: Strikes on logistics, airfields, and command centers
2.3 Second Batch (April 2024)
In April 2024, the U.S. delivered a second batch of more advanced ATACMS missiles, this time with a range of 300 km. These were most likely M39A1 or M57 variants.
Reported number: 100+ missiles
Type: Some reports say M57 unitary warhead missiles were included
Impact: Enabled Ukraine to strike deep into occupied Crimea and military targets in Donetsk and Luhansk
2.4 Additional Batches (2024–2025)
While the U.S. has not publicly disclosed all deliveries, several reports from intelligence agencies, defense sources, and battlefield evidence suggest additional ATACMS were delivered through late 2024 and early 2025.
Estimated total deliveries by early 2025: 150 to 200 ATACMS
Ongoing support: The Biden administration has reportedly approved continued ATACMS transfers on a rolling basis depending on battlefield needs.
---
3. Political Context Behind the Deliveries
3.1 Initial U.S. Hesitation
Escalation Risk: Fear of provoking a direct U.S.–Russia conflict
NATO unity: Some NATO members were cautious about long-range weapons
3.2 Change in Policy
The policy shifted after:
Repeated Russian missile strikes on Ukrainian civilians
Ukrainian commitment not to use ATACMS on Russian soil
Pressure from U.S. Congress and allies (like Poland and the UK)
3.3 Congressional Support
Bipartisan support in the U.S. Congress for arming Ukraine
Pentagon officials argued ATACMS would be a game-changer
3.4 Secrecy and Strategic Ambiguity
The U.S. did not immediately publicize the deliveries, allowing Ukraine to use them with strategic surprise. Only after successful use were the deliveries acknowledged.
---
4. Operational Impact on the Battlefield
4.1 Destruction of Russian Assets
October 2023: Berdyansk and Luhansk airfields — multiple helicopters destroyed
Later attacks: Ammunition depots, radar stations, logistics hubs
Crimea strikes: Infrastructure like railways, fuel storage
4.2 Shift in Russian Tactics
Russian aircraft and helicopters were moved farther from the front
Command posts and ammunition stores relocated or hardened
Loss of morale among Russian troops near front lines
4.3 Enhanced Ukrainian Counteroffensive Capacity
Ukraine’s 2023 and 2024 offensives were hampered by artillery deficits
ATACMS helped balance Russian advantages in range
Enabled deeper, high-value strikes with minimal Ukrainian losses
---
5. Ukrainian Use and Tactical Doctrine
5.1 Target Selection
High-value targets only: ammo dumps, command centers, airfields
Avoiding overuse due to limited supply
5.2 Integration with Intelligence
Real-time NATO and U.S. satellite intel used to select targets
Coordinated with drone surveillance and electronic warfare units
5.3 Complementing Storm Shadow and SCALP-EG
Ukraine also uses UK’s Storm Shadow and France’s SCALP-EG missiles (air-launched). ATACMS are ground-launched and provide complementary capabilities.
---
6. Types of ATACMS Delivered to Ukraine
Variant Range Warhead Type Number Delivered (Est.) Notable Use
M39 (Block I) 165 km Cluster (950 bomblets) ~30 First strikes in Luhansk & Berdyansk
M39A1 (Block IA) 300 km Cluster ~50 Crimea railways, fuel sites
M57 (Block IA Unitary) 300 km Single explosive warhead ~70 Targeted strikes on bunkers, air defenses
M57A1 300+ km Improved accuracy Unconfirmed Possibly used in high-value strikes
---
7. Estimating Total Number of ATACMS Delivered
Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) Analysis
Satellite images, Ukrainian MOD reports, and leaks
Pentagon budget allocations to replenish ATACMS stock
Estimates by Defense Analysts (As of May 2025)
Source Estimate of ATACMS Delivered
Institute for the Study of War ~150–200
Defense Express (Ukraine) ~170
Center for Strategic & Intl. Studies (CSIS) ~180+
BBC, CNN, NYT Combined Estimate ~150–160
> Consolidated Estimate: The U.S. has delivered approximately 160 to 200 ATACMS missiles to Ukraine as of May 2025.
---
8. Strategic and Geopolitical Consequences
8.1 Deterrence Against Russian Aggression
Russia is now more cautious in its rear deployments
Crimea, previously seen as untouchable, is under threat
8.2 Escalation Management
U.S. and Ukraine have avoided hitting Russian soil with ATACMS
Russia has not escalated in response to ATACMS-specific strikes
8.3 Regional Impacts
Other countries (e.g., Taiwan, South Korea) are watching U.S. use of strategic missiles
ATACMS aid signals U.S. commitment to allied defense globally
---
9. Replenishment and Production of ATACMS
9.1 Stockpile Constraints
The U.S. had a limited stock of ATACMS, many produced in the 1990s
Each ATACMS costs $1–1.5 million, depending on the variant
9.2 New Orders and Substitutes
U.S. Department of Defense has ordered replacements from Lockheed Martin
Newer systems like Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) will eventually replace ATACMS
---
10. Future Prospects
10.1 Continued Support
The U.S. is expected to continue delivering ATACMS through 2025
Delivery pace will depend on battlefield outcomes and political developments
10.2 Possibility of NATO Contributions
NATO allies might also contribute ATACMS-like systems
Poland, Romania, and others operate compatible platforms
---
Conclusion
The ATACMS has become a defining weapon in Ukraine’s long-range strike capability against Russian forces. Though the exact number is not officially confirmed due to security concerns, open-source data and defense sources strongly indicate that the United States has delivered between 160 and 200 ATACMS missiles to Ukraine as of May 2025.
This delivery has:
Altered the course of the war tactically
Delivered psychological and strategic blows to Russian forces
Demonstrated U.S. commitment to supporting Ukraine with increasingly advanced weapons systems
As the war continues, the ATACMS may continue playing a pivotal role in shaping outcomes both on the battlefield and in diplomatic negotiations
Comments